How Can Leaders Use GenAI Ethics Frameworks to Inform Their Strategies?
Generative AI (GenAI) continues to reshape society and industries at breakneck speed—particularly in highly regulated sectors such as education, healthcare, and financial services. This rapid transformation brings new ethical and strategic challenges: privacy violations, data security incidents, and intellectual property (IP) issues, among others. More than ever, leaders must create overarching GenAI ethics frameworks that complement, rather than simply extend, their existing technology systems security protocols. Protect their organizations and stakeholders—patients, students, clients, employees, and society.
Unlike traditional software, GenAI involves unpredictability and opaqueness in its decision-making processes. Referred to as “black box” models, these systems can generate outputs and behaviors that are not fully explainable, transparent, or traceable. As a result, attempting to address new GenAI-related risks by merely updating existing security measures will likely be insufficient. Instead, organizations need new leadership overarching GenAI ethics frameworks guiding the intentional human-centered design, development, deployment, and monitoring of GenAI technologies integrated with their legacy systems and protocols, aligned with the organization’s mission, goals, and ethical principles.
Introduction
At its core, GenAI’s ethical and practical use depends on mitigating risks and maintaining data integrity across more complex models. Where traditional software typically has predictable inputs, outputs, and traceable processes, GenAI does not always provide such clarity. Beyond the usual concerns of data privacy and security, GenAI’s unique “black box” nature introduces uncharted territory for leaders, from regulatory compliance questions to unforeseen output biases.
The stakes are higher now. Protecting patient health records, student information, trade secrets, or proprietary corporate data requires a nuanced approach. Leaders who adopt an overarching GenAI ethics framework can better inform policies, strategies, and day-to-day decisions—even as GenAI continues to evolve.
Recap of Previous Articles
In earlier installments of this series, we explored issues of algorithmic bias and inaccuracies in GenAI data inputs. This third installment focuses on how leaders can address data processing and output risks—privacy breaches, security vulnerabilities, and IP misuse—which are critical components of an ethically robust GenAI deployment strategy.
GenAI Ethics Key Challenges
- Data Security
GenAI systems often handle vast amounts of sensitive data, including proprietary or confidential information. Leaders may want to consider the following:- Mitigate risks like data leakage, which can expose personal or corporate data.
- Prevent unauthorized access to training datasets and model outputs.
- Implement robust policies across the organization and continuous monitoring to safeguard stakeholder information.
- Privacy Risks
GenAI magnifies challenges concerning privacy violations, especially when data is shared across different platforms or projects, departments, and stakeholders across the enterprise. Leaders may want to consider the following:- Balance GenAI-driven growth and user agency: Ensure stakeholders have a say in utilizing their data.
- Mitigate risks concerning how confidential, proprietary, or IP data could be inadvertently leaked and utilized in GenAI outputs.
- Harmonize GenAI compliance policies with key privacy regulations in their industry, such as HIPAA in healthcare or FERPA in education.
- Misuse of Intellectual Property (IP)
GenAI relies on large external and internal datasets, and ethical dilemmas arise around the sourcing and applications of data—yours and others’. Leaders may want to consider the following:- Develop critical and clear GenAI ethics policies to manage your organization’s and third-party IP to foster responsible growth.
- Double-check with your LLM vendor to ensure that the data used to train GenAI models complies with relevant copyright laws and licensing agreements.
- Monitor for the unintentional replication or distribution of proprietary materials (e.g., patient medical records, copyrighted text, creative content, or trade secrets) in GenAI-generated outputs.
Conclusion and Takeaways
Leaders looking to ethically integrate GenAI into their organizations must acknowledge the “black box” challenges and proactively address the limitations of existing security protocols. A GenAI ethics overarching framework is neither an off-the-shelf software purchase nor a simple technology policy update—it is a leadership tool for guiding decision-making and ensuring alignment with broader organizational goals, industry regulations, and stakeholders’ well-being.
GenAI ethics frameworks recommendations:
- Strengthen Data Governance
Enhance your data collection, storage, access, usage, and distribution policies to ensure that sensitive data is protected and ethically handled, informed by GenAI’s black box challenges. - Ensure Transparency
Communicate openly about how and why data is collected and processed. Provide the stakeholders the ability to consent to data usage and inform them about the implications of your vendor’s GenAI model challenges. - Adopt Privacy-Enhancing Technologies
Consider differential privacy policies that anonymize data and reduce re-identification risks. This will strengthen compliance with privacy regulations and reduce stakeholder harm and organizational reputational and financial risks. - Promote GenAI Ethical Growth
Strike a balance between technological progress and the ethical imperative to minimize harm. Align GenAI-driven growth strategies with your organization’s goals and broader human-centered goals such as well-being, fairness, and trust-building.
Reflections for Leaders
- Balancing Growth and Ethics
How does your organization weigh the benefits of GenAI-driven growth against the ethical obligation to safeguard your stakeholders? - Preserving Stakeholder Trust
What additional measures can you implement to ensure that GenAI deployments reinforce, rather than undermine, data privacy, security, and trust? - Evolving Security Protocols
How can you adapt your current security policies to encompass a GenAI ethics framework that factors in for this nascent technology’s unpredictability and “black box” nature?
Additional Resources for Leaders and References
Below are five resources that may help you stay updated on GenAI ethics, governance, and best practices:
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework. U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology.https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/Presentations/2022/ai-risk-management-framework/Day%201%20-%201115am%20Tabassi.pdf
- OECD AI Principles. Assessing potential future artificial intelligence risks, benefits, and policy imperatives. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-publications/futures
- EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai - UNESCO Guidance for AI Policy
https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research - When AI Technology and HIPAA Collide. https://www.hipaajournal.com/when-ai-technology-and-hipaa-collide
- MIT’s Securing Student Data in the Age of Generative AI. https://raise.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Securing-Student-Data-in-the-Age-of-Generative-AI_MIT-RAISE.pdf
- AI and the Law: What Educators Need to Know. https://www.edutopia.org/article/laws-ai-education/
- Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center on AI Ethics
https://cyber.harvard.edu/story/2019-10/ethics-and-governance-ai-berkman-klein-report-impact-2017-2019
Mentions:
University of San Francisco, USF School of Nursing and Health Professions, #AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association), American Association of Colleges and Universities #AAC&U, #GenAI Ethics, #AI Ethics, #Generative AI, #Higher Education, #Healthcare, #Financial Services, #Silicon Valley Startups, #Responsible AI, #Technology Ethics, #AI Governance, #Leadership